Inga G. Kharisova
Ushinsky Yaroslavl State Pedagogic University
Value-semantic model of formation of the successive results of pedagogue training
Kharisova I.G. Value-semantic model of formation of the successive results of pedagogue training. Vestnik of Kostroma State University. Series: Pedagogy. Psychology. Sociokinetics. 2021, vol. 27, № 4, pp. 257-264. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34216/2073-1426-2021-27-4-257-264
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34216/2073-1426-2021-27-4-257-264
УДК: 378:371
Publish date: 2021-11-10
Annotation: The problem of ensuring the continuous training of pedagogic staff is one of the most significant for improving the system of continuing education. How can continuity be ensured in a situation where individual stages of pedagogic training are regulated by different regulatory documents containing specific requirements for the results of mastering educational programmes of a certain level by students? The answer to this question presupposes allocation of the basic foundations for the design of targeted, meaningful, operational-activity and effective components based on the principles of continuity and continuity. In order to develop the basic foundations for combining educational programmes for pedagogic training at different stages and levels of education, it is advisable to use a value-semantic model of the formation of successive results. The model was developed by a problem group of lecturers based on the results of the study, which included conducting focus groups with the participation of students and practical pedagogues, comparative analysis of normative documents, content analysis of the products of the activities of existing teachers, conducting a survey among students of psychological and pedagogic classes, pedagogues and representatives of school administration, students and lecturers of pedagogic universities. Universal pedagogic competences (anthropocentric, social and acmeological) are defined as the basic components of the model. Indicators have been developed for each level of education that characterise the manifestation of competences in the knowledge, attitudes and qualities of future pedagogues. The value-semantic model of the formation of successive results can be used to assess the quality of pedagogic education at a separate level of training and when designing individual professional educational routes for future and current teachers, taking into account the identified deficits and problems.
Keywords: value-semantic model, pedagogic training, continuity, continuous pedagogic education, universal pedagogic competences, professional activity, axiological approach
Funding and acknowledgments: The research was carried out within the framework of the state task of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation No. 073-00077-21-02 for the implementation of scientific research on the topic ‟Scientific justification and development of a methodology for ensuring the continuity of the Federal State Educational System of general, secondary professional and higher pedagogic education in the interests of creating a unified educational space for pedagogue training”.
Literature list: Varduni T.V. Osnovnye problemy estestvennonauchnoj podgotovki specialistov v sisteme mnogourovnevogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovanija [The main problems of natural science training of specialists in the system of multilevel pedagogical education]. Fundamental'nye issledovanija: materialy IV Mezhdunarodnoj konferencii «Sovremennoe obrazovanie: problemy i reshenija», Akademija Estestvoznanija [Fundamental research: materials of the IV International Conference «Modern Education: problems and solutions», Academy of Natural Sciences], Moscow, 2007, vol. 2, pp. 50–52. (In Russ.) Gusev V.A. Professional'no-pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v mnogourovnevyh kompleksah: dis. … dokt. ped. nauk [Professional and pedagogical education in multi-level complexes: dis. ... doctor of pedagogical sciences]. Tol'jatti, 2004, 352 p. (In Russ.) Kir'jakova A.V. Teorija orientacii lichnosti v mire cennostej: monografija [Theory of personality orientation in the world of values: monograph]. Orenburg, 1996, 188 p. (In Russ.) Kozlov V.V., Mazilov V.A., Fetiskin N.P. Social'no-psihologicheskaja diagnostika razvitija lichnosti i malyh grupp [Socio-psychological diagnostics of personality development and small groups]. Moscow, 2018, 720 p. (In Russ.) Kulakova V.A., Rejhanova I.V., Bukina Ju.V. Preemstvennost' i nepreryvnost' v obrazovanii [Continuity and continuity in education]. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija: Jekonomika i upravlenie [Bulletin of Tver State University. Series: Economics and Management], 2019, vol. 2, pp. 160–166. (In Russ.) Legenchuk D.V. Preemstvennost' soderzhanija srednego i vysshego professional'nogo obrazovanija [Continuity of the content of secondary and higher professional education]. Vestnik Cheljabinskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical University], 2009, vol. 7, pp. 96–103. (In Russ.) Paharenko N.V., Zol'nikova I.N. Model' opredelenija urovnja sformirovannosti obshhekul'turnyh i professional'nyh kompetencij [Model for determining the level of formation of general cultural and professional competencies]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovanija [Modern problems of science and education], 2012, vol. 6, URL: www.science-education.ru/106-7502 (access date: 20.03.2021). (In Russ.) Slastenin V.A., Isaev I.F., Shijanov N.E. Pedagogika: ucheb. posobie dlja stud. vyssh. ped. ucheb. zavedenij [Pedagogy: textbook for students. higher. ped. studies. institutions], ed. by V.A. Slastenina. Moscow, 2013, 576 p. (In Russ.) Slovar' russkogo jazyka: in 4 vols. [Dictionary of the Russian language. research.], 4th ed., ster. Moscow, 1999, vol. 4, pp. 160–161. (In Russ.) Filatova L.O. Pereemstvennost' obshhego i srednego i vuzovskogo obrazovanij [The succession of general and secondary and university education]. Pedagogika [Pedagogy], 2004, vol. 8, p. 63–68. (In Russ.) Shadrikov V.D. Problemy sistemogeneza professional'noj dejatel'nosti [Problems of systemogenesis of professional activity]. Moscow, 1982, 135 p. (In Russ.) Shapovalov A.A. Metodologicheskie problemy obnovlenija vysshego pedagogicheskogo obrazovanija [Methodological problems of updating higher pedagogical education]. Pedagog. nauka, tehnologija, praktika [Teacher. Science, technology, practice], 1997, vol. 2, pp. 48–54. (In Russ.) Shlenov Ju., Mosicheva I., Shestak V. Nepreryvnoe obrazovanie v Rossii [Continuing education in Russia]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia], 2005, vol. 3, pp. 36–49. (In Russ.) Shhurkova N.E. Prikladnaja pedagogika vospitanija: uchebnoe posobie [Applied pedagogy of education: textbook]. Moscow, 2005, 68 p. (In Russ.)
Author's info: Inga G. Kharisova, Candidate of Pedagogic Sciences, Ushinsky Yaroslavl State Pedagogic University, Yaroslavl, Russia, i.kharisova@yspu.org, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7782-664X